N
Negotiations.AI
This article hasn't been translated to RU yet. Showing the English version for now.
← Back to blog

Evaluating AI Outputs Framework for Contract Redlines

A simple framework to apply Evaluating AI Outputs to Contract Redlines with real examples.

3 min read

Evaluating AI Outputs Framework for Contract Redlines

Quick answer: Evaluating AI outputs in contract redlining requires a systematic approach to identify inaccuracies, assess reliability, and ensure alignment with negotiation goals. This framework will help you streamline your evaluation process effectively.

In today’s fast-paced business environment, AI tools are becoming indispensable in contract negotiations. Leveraging AI for contract redlines can enhance efficiency, but it also raises concerns about accuracy and reliability. This blog post presents a framework for evaluating AI outputs in contract redlining, ensuring you can confidently integrate AI into your negotiation strategy.

Understanding AI Outputs in Contract Redlining

AI tools, particularly those utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs), can suggest redlines or modifications based on vast datasets. However, these outputs are not infallible. They can sometimes produce hallucinations—fabricated information that seems plausible. To effectively utilize AI in contract negotiation, understanding how to evaluate these outputs is critical.

The Importance of Evaluation

Evaluating AI outputs involves assessing the accuracy, relevance, and alignment of the suggested changes with your negotiation strategy. It’s essential to maintain a balance between efficiency and accuracy to avoid costly mistakes in your contracts.

Framework for Evaluating AI Outputs

This framework provides a structured approach to assessing AI-generated redlines. It comprises three main steps:

1. Verification

  • Check for Accuracy: Review the AI suggestions against existing legal standards and your organization’s requirements. Is the language used appropriate and precise?
  • Cross-reference: Compare AI outputs with previous contracts or established templates to identify discrepancies.

Example: If an AI suggests a change in a liability clause that reduces your potential liability significantly, verify that this aligns with your company’s risk management policies.

2. Relevance Assessment

  • Contextual Fit: Evaluate whether the AI's suggestions are contextually relevant. Are they aligned with your negotiation objectives? Does the proposed language reflect the current deal structure?
  • Stakeholder Input: Engage relevant stakeholders (legal, financial, etc.) to assess the impact of the suggested changes. Their expertise can provide insights into the practicality of AI-generated outputs.

3. Alignment with Negotiation Goals

  • Strategic Review: Ensure that the redlines align with your overarching negotiation strategy. Do they enhance your position or weaken it?
  • Risk Analysis: Consider the potential risks associated with each suggested change. Will it expose your organization to unforeseen liabilities or compliance issues?

Actionable Template for Evaluating AI Outputs

| Step | Action Item | Responsible Party | Deadline | |---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------| | Verification | Check accuracy against legal standards | Legal Team | [Set Date] | | | Cross-reference with existing contracts | Contract Manager | [Set Date] | | Relevance Assessment | Evaluate contextual fit and stakeholder feedback | Negotiation Team | [Set Date] | | Alignment with Goals | Review strategic alignment and conduct risk analysis | Executive Stakeholders | [Set Date] |

Concrete Negotiation Scenario

Let’s consider a negotiation scenario involving a software licensing agreement. Your company is negotiating a license fee of $100,000 for a software product. The AI suggests redlining the termination clause to allow for immediate termination without cause, which could potentially expose your company to risks.

Evaluation Steps:

  1. Verification: Check the suggested termination clause against industry standards.
  2. Relevance Assessment: Consult with the legal team to evaluate if immediate termination is a common practice or if it puts your company at risk.
  3. Alignment: Discuss with executives whether this clause aligns with your long-term vendor management strategy. If the suggested clause weakens your position, it may require modification.

AI Prompts to Practice

Learn more about our AI negotiation co-pilot.

Try the AI negotiation co-pilot

Use Negotiations.AI to prepare, strategize, and role-play your next procurement or vendor negotiation.